The legal system separates individuals’ personal assets from their superannuation. Generally speaking, upon death, personal assets are pooled into the estate of the deceased and the executor or legal personal representative distributes the assets to the beneficiaries in accordance with the will. However, superannuation death benefits can bypass the estate and be directed straight to a beneficiary.
Upon a person’s death, any money held in superannuation needs to be distributed by the trustee of the superannuation fund. If a person has made a binding nomination then the trustee must pay the death benefit as nominated by the deceased. However, a non-binding nomination allows the trustee to use his or her discretion to follow the stated wishes of the deceased or to pay the entitlement directly to the estate of the deceased.
If a person has not made a nomination then the trustee can distribute the superannuation death benefits to any person that satisfy the definition of a dependant under the legislation or the estate of the deceased. Making a determination in this regard can be difficult for a trustee, especially if there are competing claims by family members e.g., adult children or children from a previous marriage.
Conflict of Interests
It is not uncommon for a trustee of a superannuation fund to also be the executor or legal personal representative of an estate. A recent Supreme Court of Queensland case examined this very situation to determine whether an administrator of a deceased estate was in breach of her fiduciary duties because she did not take active steps to have the deceased’s superannuation death benefits paid to the estate. Instead the administrator preferred her own interests by applying to have the superannuation funds paid to her personally as a dependant of the deceased.
James McIntosh dies at the age of 40 without a will, surviving partner or children. At the time of his death he lived with his mother, Elizabeth, who cared for him through his various illnesses. James’ had lived with his mother most of his life. His parents separated when he was very young and James’ did not have a relationship with his father.
As James died without a will, his mother applied to be the administrator of her son’s estate and was so appointed. The net assets of James’ estate was about $80,000. Under the intestacy rules, James’ estate would be divided equally between his parents. However, James had significantly more in various superannuation funds, with the total being more than $450,000. James had made a non-binding death benefit nomination for each fund in favour of Elizabeth.
Elizabeth applied to James superannuation funds to have his super death benefits paid to her personally, stated that she supported James throughout his illness and was therefore a dependent of the deceased. Each superannuation fund agreed to pay the superannuation death benefits to her.
On becoming aware of this situation, James’ father, John, demanded that James’ death benefits be paid into the estate on the basis that Elizabeth had breached her fiduciary duty to the estate by actively seeking payment to herself personally rather than maximising the estate.
The Court found that there was a clear conflict of duty. Elizabeth had applied for the release of the death benefits to herself after her appointment as administrator of James’ estate. Her obligation as administrator of the estate was to act honestly and in good faith for the benefit of the beneficiaries. Accordingly, Elizabeth was ordered to account to the estate for all of the death benefits received by her.
This case is a strong reminder of the importance of a person making a binding death benefit nomination. Had a valid binding death benefit nomination been in place in favour of Elizabeth, this case probably would not have arisen. Further, where there is a non-binding nomination the deceased member’s superannuation death benefits should be paid to the estate to maximise the amount for distribution to the beneficiaries. If for any reason the deceased’s superannuation death benefits are not paid into the estate, then the executor or legal personal representative maybe in breach of their fiduciary duties.
The information on this website is of a general nature only. It is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult a lawyer for individual advice about your particular circumstances.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Proessional Standards Legislation.
Click here to go back to Publications.